DUO SILSILE DOO RASTE
PART-2
Discussion , ON
WAY OF PRECAUTION :-
We are standing on an intersection ( Doraha ) and if we can not
surely decide which option is to be adopted so in such a situation,
the way of precaution will be the best. Now under the law of precaution
we will discuss some of the basic concepts and the actions (Amal ) of both
the ways or schools of thoughts, and see which one is the way of
precaution.
The Khelafath :-(
Islamic leadership )
On the concept of Khelafath both schools of thought ( Sunni & Shia )
have basic differences.
Sunni
Point of View :-
According to Sunni point of view the Holy Prophet left this world
without giving any decision on the issue of Khelafath. After the death of Holy
Prophet the people of Madina got together to nominate some one as a head
of Islamic state or as a caliph (the Successor )of the Holy
Prophet. By some means the people of Madina appointed Hazrat Abu
Baker as a Caliph of the Holy Prophet , So the Khelafath of Hazret Abu
Bakar was erected by the decision of the people of Madina which was
later on enforced by law in the whole Islamic state. By leaving a little
minority rest whole of the Muslim world bowed to that enforced Khelafath.
Now if some one contradicts to this Khelafath is as he has contradicted
to the decision of the majority.
Theme of Sunni Point Of View :-
By deep thinking on this point of view we come to the conclusion that
according to this point of view there is no instruction or order to be
followed from God or from the Holy Prophet about Khelafath therefore, if
some one contradicts or opposes to this erected Khelafath means that he is
not opposing to any order of God or of the Holy Prophet but he is only
opposing to the decision of the majority of the Muslims. Anyone
who opposes to the decision of the majority cannot be accused according
to the law of Sheriat because even to day in the Muslim world the
existence of opposite party which contradict to the decision of the
majority of the Muslim is lawfully accepted and they can never be
considered the opponent of Islam though they are the opponent of
the government
which is erected by the majority of the Muslims. According to this point
of view opposing or not accepting the erected Khelafath does not at
all effect the Akherat ( the life after death ) can be that the opposing group
has to face a lot of hardship in this world.
Shia
Point of View :-
According to Shia
point of view the Holy Prophet by the order of God at Ghdeer-e-Khum
in an extra ordinary gathering of Sahaba-e-Karam ( more than 100,000
Sahaba-e-Karam ) appointed Hazrat Ali as his Successor, Caliph and the
head of whole Islamic state after him. All those Sahaba-e-Karam who were present
there accepted this decision happily or unhappily and the Holy Prophet put the responsibility
on all those who were present there to convey this message to all those
who were not present there. Although there were some people and groups
who did not accept this nomination from the core of their heart but still they did
not contradict there openly. After the death of Holy Prophet all these
who were not happy by this nomination refused the khelafath of Hazrat Ali
so they gathered and nominated Hazrat Abu Baker as
a Caliph of the Holy Prophet and in doing so they got a great support of
all those groups who were highly against the Hazrat Ali . (Such groups
and individual were discussed in detail in our first article Ajre Risalat
)
According to Shia point of view the nomination of Hazrat Ali as a Caliph
of the Holy Prophet was by the order of God so any one who refuses or
contradicts
this nomination has rejected and opposed the order of God
and the Holy Prophet. And according to the Holy Quran all those who
oppose or reject the order of God are errant and have ended themselves
in disastrous state.
Now by keeping both concepts in
view decide the way of precaution . . . . . . ?
Prayer :-
Prayer is the most
important Islamic practice (aml) and it must be performed exactly as the Holy
Prophet himself performed.
Sunni
Point of View :-
According to Sunni point of
view the Holy Prophet performed prayer in both ways by folding his
arms as well as by keeping the arms open freely on his sides. Both ways are
correct. So with in Sunni school of thought one of their sect Malki pray by
keeping their arms open .
Shia Point Of View:-
According to Shia point of
view the Holy Prophet never fold his arms while praying ,All the A-Eima of this
school of thought strongly reject the idea of folding of arms during prayer.
therefore if anyone who prays by folding his arm is contradicting the Holy
Prophet so the prayers of his whole life will go in vain without any reward.
Now by keeping both concepts in
view find the way of precaution . . . . . . ?
FAST
:-
Sunni
Point of View :-
According to Sunni
point of view the Fast must be ended just with the sunsets .
If someone delays in braking the fast,then his fast will be devalued (
Makroo ). Makroo means that aml will be correct but its return in form of reward (
Sawab ) will decrease it means that instead of 100% reward one may get
70% or so. As per this point of view not braking the fast with the
sun set does not endanger the aml itself but results in decrease of its
reward.
Shia Point Of View :-
According to Shia point
of view the ending of fast is not at the normal sunset but at Sheri sunset ( Sheri Ghroob ) and its indication is that after the sunset the
darkness rising from the east should reach over the head, and it is about
eight minutes after the sunset. Now according to this point of view if
some one has broken his fast even one minute before the sheri Ghroob he is
like some one who has broken his fast before time and he has to pay a penalty.
And plenty is to keep sixty fasts to cover up his mistake. Now if some one
in full month of Ramzan keep braking his fast at sun set means that
instead he remained hungry and thirsty through out the month and at the
end of Ramzan instead of getting any reward he has to pay penalty of 1830 fasts
and if through out his life one remained practicing the same how much he
will be under penalty (countless ). So what he got , through out his life
remained fasting and died under heavy penalty ( for a average life about penalty of 90000 fasts ) instead of any reward.
Now by keeping both concepts in
view find the way of precaution . . . . . . ?
-
HAJJ :-
In
Hajj or Umra there is one important action (performance) called
Tawaf-un-Nisa see the concept of both schools of thought about it.
Sunni
Point of View :-
Tawaf-un-Nisa is not recognized
by Sunni school of thought therefore, the people performing Hajj or Umra
according to Sunni teachings do not perform Tawaf-un-Nisa.
Shia Point of View :-
According to Shia school of thought the Tawaf-un-Nisa is a necessary part of
Hajj or Umra and it must be performed by all those who are performing Hajj
or Umra. As with the beginning of Aehram for Hajj or Umra like many other
things the relations of husband and wife become restricted till the
one performing Hajj or Umra performs Tawaf-un-Nisa. Even if the
unmarried boy or girl perform Hajj or Umra and did not perform
Tawaf-un-Nisa they can not marry till they perform Tawaf-un-Nisa and if
the husbandry relations are established they will be illegal( Haram) by
Islamic point of view.
Now if the Sunni point of view is correct that there is no Tawaf-un-Nisa
than those who are performing Tawaf-un-Nisa have lost nothing except the
hard work of one extra Tawaf and if the Shia point of view is correct that
tawaf-un-Nisa is a must and without performing this Tawaf the husbandry
relation through out the life will remain Haram and the future race coming
into existence due to such relation will also be haram !( ILLICIT )
Now by keeping both concepts in
view find the way of precaution . . . . . . ?
The prayer of Tarawi :-
Sunni
Point of View :-
In the month of Holy Ramzan to pray
some Nawafel ( may be eight, twelve or twenty ) in every night with Jamat
is called Tarawi ( thought they can be performed individually but normally
as far as possible they are performed with Jamaat )
Shia Point of view :-
In Shia point of view there are also
some Nawafel to be performed in the every night during the Holy
month of Ramzan. But according to their concept the Nawafel can not
be performed with Jamat and they have to be performed individually
otherwise with jamat they will be Batel ( deserving no reward )
Now both have performed Nawafel if the Sunni point of view is correct then
the Shias will be also rewarded but with less reward because the reward
with Jamaat is always more then individual performance, but still
their performance is reward able and if the Shia point of view is correct
that by performing Nawafel with Jamaat will result the whole
performance rewardless ( Batal ).
Now by keeping both concepts in
view find the way of precaution . . . . . . ?
Conclusion
:-
The few basic Aqaid (Concept ) and Ammal of
both schools of thought are presented. Now the one who is standing on the
intersection
(Doraha ) is to adopt the way of precaution because the way of precaution
is the way of success which never put in disaster.
******************************************************
|